Faye is a wildlife expert who works for a major zoo. Because her love of animals does not end when she leaves work each night, she has a number of exotic pets in her home, including a small capuchin monkey that she calls Kong. Unfortunately, although Kong had no history of violent behaviour, he viciously attacked a door- to- door canvasser named Ray who rang Faye's doorbell one evening. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) Faye cannot be held liable unless the court is satisfied that she either carelessly controlled Kong or intentionally caused Kong to attack Ray.
B) Under the traditional common law rules, Faye cannot be held liable because Kong had not previously bitten anyone.
C) Even if she would otherwise be held strictly liable for Ray's injuries, Faye may escape liability by proving that before ringing her doorbell, Ray had seen a sign that clearly warned of the danger of wild animals and directed strangers not to approach the house.
D) Liability for wild animals is a type of intentional tort.
E) because the common law imposes absolute liability on anyone who has control of a wild animal, Faye will be held liable for Ray's injuries and there no defences that are available to her
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Bentham Inc sued Locke Ltd in tort.
Q11: Christine entered into a contract with Vernon.
Q12: Jose has sued Sharona in tort as
Q13: Max worked in a warehouse owned by
Q14: Brian takes great pride in being obnoxious.
Q16: Werner owns a number of animals that
Q17: Abdul worked for Primus Finance Co. Following
Q18: As a result of dumping toxic materials
Q19: Terry committed a tort against Julia by
Q20: During an argument, Sylvia flew into a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents