Gawain and Julie are neighbours. Gawain committed the tort of trespass to land by smashing a window in Julie's attic with a baseball bat. Julie could have quickly and easily fixed that damage by paying a home repair company $1000. Instead, she did nothing for eight months. At the end of that period, a thunderstorm caused rain to pour into Julie's attic through the broken window. Julie then paid a home repair company $4000 to fix both the broken window and the damage caused to the attic by the rain. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) A court would probably impose an injunction to require Gawain to fix the damage to Julie's house himself.
B) The doctrine of mitigation is used to deter the commission of torts.
C) A court would probably award Julie compensatory damages of $1000.
D) A court would probably award Julie compensatory damages of $4000.
E) The doctrine of mitigation would not apply because Gawain committed an intentional tort.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Suneeta successfully sued Olaf in tort.In this
Q19: Lupine Inc.successfully sued Wolf Finance Ltd.in both
Q33: During an argument in a nightclub, Marie
Q34: Gold Star Investment Inc is in the
Q35: Case Brief 3.2 discusses the Supreme Court
Q36: Ethical Perspective 3.1 discussed the Supreme Court
Q37: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q39: Miriam worked as a financial advisor with
Q40: The Kingston Maroons Corp (usually known simply
Q43: The provincial government has become very concerned
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents