On January 1, 2001, Daniel negotiated a contract on behalf of Compu/sys Inc for the supply of a computer system to Leader Co. The contract called for the supply by Compu/sys Inc of hardware and maintenance services for two years in return for $1 000 000. Daniel had no authority to negotiate this contract on behalf of Compu/sys. Subsequently, after 18 months of negotiations, he got Compu/sys to agree to perform the contract in part. The corporation agreed to provide the hardware but not the maintenance services. At the time it made this commitment it had gone bankrupt. Which of the following is TRUE?
A) Compu/sys has not ratified the contract because a bankrupt corporation cannot ratify a contract.
B) If Compu/sys has not ratified the contract, Daniel will only be personally liable if Daniel and Leader Co intended that the contract would be binding on the agent personally.
C) Compu/sys has not ratified the contract because it has not agreed to all of the obligations under the contract.
D) Compu/sys has not ratified the contract because it did not agree to the obligations under the contract within a reasonable time.
E) all of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Oxford Management Inc is a management consulting
Q11: A strategic alliance includes
A) an agreement between
Q12: Artemis has entered into a contract with
Q13: Silvio began work as an agent for
Q14: Digital Technologies Inc entered into an agreement
Q16: Stone entered into an agreement with Star
Q17: Alannis is an agent but not an
Q18: Anton has entered into a contract with
Q19: Agents have a fiduciary duty to their
Q20: Puporting to act on behalf of Otton
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents