A court recently held Acme Corp responsible for spilling pollutants into a stream. Which of the following statements is most likely TRUE?
A) If the court required proof beyond a reasonable doubt, Acme Corp was called the accused.
B) Since Acme Corp is not a human being, the case was heard in a special court called the Commercial Court of Canada.
C) If the claim against Acme Corp arose in private law, it almost certainly was heard by a jury, as well as a judge.
D) If the court required proof beyond a reasonable doubt, the claim against Acme Corp arose in private law.
E) If Acme Corp is dissatisfied with that decision, it is entitled to appeal, but only if it is willing to pay for the other side to bring its witnesses back into court.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: Rawls Inc recently sued Nozick Ltd. As
Q9: Hobbes has sued Kant for breach of
Q10: Herbert & Hart Inc, an accounting firm,
Q11: The front window of Polly's Flower Shop
Q12: Wolodko Engineering Inc sued Dhaliwal Ltd for
Q14: Kirndeep recently received a Bachelor of Business
Q15: Examinations for discovery
A) are designed primarily to
Q16: Josie lost a breach of contract case
Q17: The doctrine of precedent
A) prevents a judge
Q18: At the end of a case, a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents