On March 1, Giselle Saw Harlan Demonstrating a New Type

On March 1, Giselle saw Harlan demonstrating a new type of widget at a trade show. On April 1, she ordered one from him. Under the terms of that contract, Harlan was required to deliver the widget on May 1 and Giselle was required to pay the entire purchase price of $10 000 on June 1. Harlan did not deliver the widget until May 15. Although Giselle accepted the item and agrees that it is in good working order, she is unhappy. The late delivery caused her to lose $5000 in profits. She should sue Harlan on the basis of his breach of an implied term

A) that requires fitness for purpose.
B) of merchantable quality.
C) concerning description.
D) that is classified as a condition, rather than a warranty.
E) dealing with samples.