Crystal purchased a specific, fully functioning widget from Husker Du Inc. She promised to pay the price of $10 000 within one month. As part of a promotional campaign, Husker Du agreed to deliver the widget to her factory for free. While shipping the widget to Crystal's place, however, Husker Du's employee carelessly left its truck unlocked on the street during his lunch break. The widget was stolen from the truck and has never been recovered. Husker Du nevertheless insists that Crystal had already acquired property in the widget by the time of the theft and that she therefore was required to honour her promise to pay $10 000. Is that argument correct? Did property pass to Crystal? Is she required to pay the price? Explain your answer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q2: Marlene agreed to purchase a specific dress
Q10: Pavel bought a widget from Anna.The widget
Q12: Because of the need for commercial certainty,
Q14: James agreed to sell a widget to
Q15: Although the Sale of Goods Act does
Q18: There is a common element to the
Q20: Merckx Cycle displayed five identical bicycles in
Q52: Helene operates a beauty salon. She cut
Q64: Zounds Sounds,a music store,ordered 20 cases of
Q65: Sareena has owned and operated her own
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents