A man and his elderly aunt entered into an oral contract.He promised to provide services to her for the rest of her life and she promised to leave a specific house to him under her will.That house was worth $10 000.The nephew performed his end of the bargain by spending $3000 to care for his aunt before she died.He was disappointed upon her death,however,to learn that her will did not leave the house to him.The nephew thought about suing his aunt's estate for breach of contract.His lawyer has explained,however,that that action will fail because while the contract is valid,it is also unenforceable.It deals with an interest in land,but contrary to the Statute of Frauds,it was not evidenced in writing.It was entirely oral.Is there any basis upon which the nephew can successfully sue his aunt's estate? If so,will the expectations that the nephew had under the contract be fulfilled? Or will some other measure of relief be available to him? Explain your answers.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q62: Why are the courts willing to award
Q65: When will punitive damages be available for
Q70: Millennium Properties enter into a contract to
Q71: "Reliance damages cannot be used to escape
Q71: On December 16, Ludwig agreed to sell
Q73: A distinction is often drawn between cost
Q73: On April 1ˢᵗ Ken entered into a
Q74: "A contractual term for liquidated damages relieves
Q75: "Compensation is normally not available for intangible
Q76: Berner Building Inc agreed to build a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents