"Compensation is normally not available for intangible losses. Recently, however, Canadian courts have begun to award compensation in such circumstances if one of the purposes of the contract was to protect the plaintiff's peace of mind. In one case, for instance, an elderly couple was awarded damages for the grief that they suffered after their beloved dog was suffocated in an airplane's cargo hold. The couple had stressed to the airline, at the outset, how much the dog meant to them." On the basis of such cases, it has been suggested that compensation is available for intangible losses if they are not too remote from the defendant's breach. Formulate an argument that supports that statement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q20: While damages in tort are always backward-looking,
Q62: Why are the courts willing to award
Q63: "The idea of compensation usually means that
Q63: Provide two reasons as to why courts
Q64: Pascal,who is 15 years old,entered into a
Q64: What are nominal damages? Why is it
Q65: When will punitive damages be available for
Q66: Slodder Construction Co entered into a contract
Q73: A distinction is often drawn between cost
Q76: Berner Building Inc agreed to build a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents