Darius Was Driving His Car Negligently and Collided with Georgette

Darius was driving his car negligently and collided with Georgette. Darius was not going that fast, and normally, the injuries suffered by Georgette would not have been that severe. Unfortunately, she suffers from a progressive nerve disease which is aggravated by the accident. Which of the following is TRUE?

A) Darius is not responsible for the additional damages attributed to Georgette's condition. They were reasonably foreseeable.
B) Darius is responsible for some of the additional damages attributable to Georgette's condition - namely, the extent to which the accident worsened her condition.
C) Darius is responsible for all for the additional damages attributed to Georgette's condition.
D) This case is an illustration of the "crumbling skull plaintiff."
E) Both B and D.