Brock Brocklin, a stockbroker, invited Tom Thomson, a long-term client, to lunch to sell some stocks. Tom brought a friend, Clive Clernons. Brock mistakenly recommended Morden Plastics as being a good investment. The three martinis clouded his memory: the company name should have been Borden Plastics. Tom didn't buy Morden Plastics, but Clive did and lost heavily. Now Clive wants to sue Brock for negligence advice. Which of the following is true?
A) There is no right to sue for negligent use of words.
B) There was no contract between Brock and Clive so Clive has no legal basis to sue.
C) Clive will have to establish that he was in the scope of duty owed by Brock to win his action.
D) Clive will only have to prove that Brock was careless to win his action.
E) Clive should sue Tom for breach of fiduciary duty.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q75: In the law of negligence you owe
Q76: The "but for" test is used in
Q77: Which of the following is TRUE?
A)Auditors give
Q78: A plaintiff who has been seriously injured
Q79: Arthur Walker, an accountant, prepared financial statements
Q81: A professional can never be found liable
Q82: Contributory negligence means the injured plaintiff is
Q83: Professionals by virtue of their skill and
Q84: A social host is not held to
Q85: A financial advisor who gives advice leading
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents