The federal government is planning a law that would make it an offence to make negative remarks about the intelligence of the American President. The government claims that this is necessary at the present time for reasons of national security. If the law were challenged under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, what would you expect the courts to decide?
A) The law is ultra vires federal jurisdiction as speech is a purely local or private matter.
B) The law infringes the freedom of thought, opinion, and expression guaranteed by the Charter.
C) The law is justified as a reasonable limit in a free and democratic society.
D) There is a specific exemption in the Charter for legislation passed for national security reasons.
E) Both B and C
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: Over which of the following matters does
Q36: The case of Vriend v. Alberta established
A)the
Q37: The British North America Act was amended
Q38: Where do the residual powers to deal
Q39: In the Big M Drug Mart case,
Q41: Which of the following may use a
Q42: Dan Leman is employed by True North
Q43: Which of the following statements correctly describes
Q44: Ravinder Singh is a Sikh and, in
Q45: The Federal Government has power to make
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents