Kassem was a real estate agent with his own firm. Because his agency was new in a competitive field, he hired the company of Barrett and Barrett Ltd. to advise on an advertising strategy and to design ads for the newspaper and for brochures. Jack Barrett, senior employee, was handling the market research, and the employee Armstrong was doing the illustrations. When the work was complete, the ads went to press. Unfortunately, after the printing, it was discovered that in all the ads and in every brochure "Kassem" was spelled "Kassim." Armstrong had made the mistake in his copy. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) For breach of contract, Kassem could successfully sue only the company, Barrett and Barrett Ltd.
B) Kassem can choose to sue either the company or its employee Armstrong for breach of contract, but not both.
C) Kassem can sue both the company and its employee Armstrong for breach of contract, since they were both connected with the job.
D) If the company did not pay Armstrong, Armstrong could sue Kassem for his pay because Armstrong did do work for Kassem.
E) Kassem's only recourse is against Armstrong, the employee who made the mistake.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q43: Mike is given a bottle of wine
Q44: In AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc.,
Q45: In 978011 Ontario Ltd. v. Cornell Engineering
Q46: Misgana ran into Tarja at their local
Q47: When you went home for Thanksgiving dinner,
Q49: A and B entered into a contract
Q50: Mr. and Mrs. H were induced to
Q51: Al sells gravel to Bob on credit,
Q52: Mr. Ho talked with Mr. Tarr, who
Q53: In Works v. Works, what was the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents