Sam and John drank beer and watched the Olympics for hours. When John left, he did not feel impaired, but the alcohol in his system affected his driving. He lost control of his car, which crashed through Mr. Mitsu's fence and into Mr. Mitsu's garage. Mitsu's neighbour, Mr. Watson, called the police. John was charged with driving while impaired and was found guilty in the criminal proceedings. Given these facts, which of the following is true?
A) Mr. Watson, the neighbour, could sue John for negligence.
B) Mr. Mitsu could sue John for negligence.
C) If Mr. Mitsu sued John, he would be entitled only to punitive damages.
D) Because John was charged with an offence, Mr. Mitsu cannot sue him in a civil action for compensation. One court action is all that is allowed.
E) Since no one was physically injured, there could be no civil action.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: The director of the children's zoo, Mr.
Q3: In which of the following would the
Q4: Al bought a case of beer because
Q5: As a result of careless driving, Mr.
Q6: Which of the following statements best describes
Q8: In which of the following cases is
Q9: Raheel wants to sue a manufacturer who
Q10: Which of the following is true with
Q11: Creative Farming Ltd. manufactures fertilizer from organic
Q12: Which of the following situations could not
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents