When Joan visited her friend Clive, who was renting a small farm in Langley, she was injured by some dangerous cleaning solvent that Clive stores in very large quantities for Soapo Ltd. The solvent had leaked from one of several massive 1000-litre drums. When Joan had walked toward the side door of the farmhouse, she stepped through a puddle of what turned out to be solvent. The solvent not only ruined her shoes, but also burned her skin when some splashed onto her legs. The solvent also drained down into the fish pond on the adjacent property owned by the Nelsons. Read each of the following separately and indicate which is true.
A) If the Nelsons sue for any loss, they would not succeed against Clive because he is just the tenant of the farm, not the owner.
B) If the Nelsons sued on the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher, the defendant could succeed by showing that there was no intention to harm anyone and reasonable care had been taken to contain the solvent.
C) If Joan sued Clive, she would not sue on the rule of strict liability but under the Occupiers' Liability Act.
D) If the Nelsons sued on the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher, they would be barred from also pleading negligence as an alternative cause of action.
E) If Joan sues for any loss, she must sue the owner of the farm.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Which of the following statements with regard
Q19: Two real estate agents, pressed for time,
Q20: Which of the following situations could result
Q21: Paul invited several friends over to celebrate
Q22: Celebrating the end of the fall term,
Q24: Although there was no carelessness on the
Q25: Sumanthra, an accountant, prepared financial statements for
Q26: For his Superbowl Sunday party, Jack bought,
Q27: In Hodgkinson v. Simms, an accountant advised
Q28: Stella bought a cup of coffee at
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents