A land appraiser prepared an appraisal of a property for a real-estate development company. The appraiser had been told that the appraisal would be used by the company to attract potential investors. Because the appraiser forgot to check the recent changes in the zoning by-laws, the appraisal was not accurate; the investor, a party unknown to the appraiser, was misled about the value of the land and, consequently, suffered a financial loss. On these facts, which of the following is true?
A) A land appraiser owes a duty of care to his client, the company, but not to any potential investors.
B) A land appraiser owes a duty of care to his client, and to potential investors only if he knows the name of the investor.
C) The investor might sue the appraiser for "negligent misstatement causing economic loss."
D) The investor must suffer his own loss, because an investor takes the risk and so must take care.
E) A person cannot be sued for words that cause loss, only for actions that cause physical injury.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: Which of the following statements with regard
Q30: Pete and John had been hired by
Q31: Ms. J was severely injured as the
Q32: Ms. Lam bought a lot next to
Q33: An investor who wanted to build a
Q35: In which of the following would the
Q36: To have the schools valued for insurance
Q37: Which of the following statements describes the
Q38: Last month, Rueben removed a tall tree
Q39: With regard to the law of negligence,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents