The plaintiff, M, quit her job because her employee, Mr. C, made unwelcome sexual advances and her career was not advanced as promised. Subsequently, Mr. C, on his own initiative, called her past employer, her present employer, and an instructor at vocational school and said that M was a thief, a false statement. As a result of these calls, M lost her new job. Which of the following is true?
A) Technically, M could sue Mr. C for libel.
B) Mr. C's statement is defamatory by innuendo.
C) Mr. C could successfully use the defence of qualified privilege.
D) Mr. C could successfully use the defence of fair comment.
E) Mr. C could be sued successfully for defamation even though the defamatory words were not written down.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: After the Leans began to use their
Q22: Conversion takes place in all of the
Q23: Although nothing at all had been stolen,
Q24: Which of the following statements is correct?
A)
Q25: Which of the following is an intentional
Q27: Malicious prosecution occurs when a person
A) initiates
Q28: Mr. and Mrs. Hampton went to a
Q29: In Braintech v. Kostiuk, the Court confirmed
Q30: Which of the following actions would not
Q31: Intentionally appropriating the goods of another can
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents