Delma Banks Jr. was charged with murder; his lawyer failed to vigorously cross-examine an informant testifying against Banks or to investigate the case. Consequently, Banks may not have received a fair trial because of poor representation. If so, a retentionist would argue that the injustice in the conduct of the trial would
A) show that capital punishment was also unjust.
B) be irrelevant to the justice or injustice of capital punishment.
C) be relevant to the injustice of capital punishment.
D) be strong evidence against the death penalty.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: A utilitarian who wants to argue against
Q14: Suppose a utilitarian abolitionist argues that the
Q15: The issue of forgiving a criminal (for
Q16: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that
Q17: Evidence conclusively shows that the death penalty
Q19: A common utilitarian argument in favor of
Q20: The deliberate and authorized causing of pain
Q21: _ are those people who want to
Q22: Underpinning many retributive views of capital punishment
Q23: Some retentionists contend that if the administration
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents