Consider the following premises of a moral argument about immigration:
1) If high levels of immigration by low-skilled workers make it unlikely that we will fulfill our moral obligations to the poorest Americans, then we should reduce or stop such immigration.
2) Currently high levels of immigration by low-skilled workers do make it unlikely that we will fulfill our moral obligations to the poorest Americans.
Which of the following conclusions would make this argument valid?
A) Therefore, we should encourage immigration, especially from countries with low-skilled workers.
B) Therefore, we should reduce or stop high levels of immigration by low-skilled workers.
C) Therefore, we should not reduce or stop high levels of immigration by low-skilled workers.
D) Therefore, we should try to improve the education systems of countries with low-skilled workers.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: In 1939 the United States turned away
Q7: Libertarians argue for cosmopolitanism by pointing out
Q8: There is universal agreement on all sides
Q9: Which of the following would be a
Q10: Immigrants are taking jobs away from American
Q12: Evidence collected over decades shows that immigrants
Q13: During the Civil War (1862) General Ulysses
Q14: Some argue that a wealthy nation that
Q15: In 1965, the U.S. Congress passed the
Q16: Those who appeal to utilitarian considerations argue
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents