In Davis v. Davis, the court held that if a divorcing couple cannot decide what to do with unused frozen pre-embryos:
A) the party wishing to use the embryos for procreation should ordinarily prevail, assuming the other party has a reasonable possibility of achieving parenthood by means other than the use of the frozen pre-embryos in question
B) the party wishing to avoid procreation should ordinarily prevail, assuming the other party has a reasonable possibility of achieving parenthood by means other than the use of the frozen pre-embryos in question
C) the judge should destroy the pre-embryos
D) the dispute should be resolved in arbitration
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: An embryo is an egg that has
Q4: The risks of egg donation have been
Q5: A zygote is an unfertilized egg.
Q6: When eggs are donated:
A)the average fee paid
Q7: One in eight couples in the United
Q8: Infertility is the failure of a couple
Q9: A genetic parent is:
A)a presumed parent
B)a gestational
Q10: Surgically removing eggs from a woman's ovaries,
Q12: In Louisiana, a viable in vitro fertilized
Q14: When a couple cannot agree on the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents