The Kent case was appealed because he was unlawfully detained and interrogated and was deprived of counsel and his parents were not notified.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement correctly describes the basis for the appeal in the Kent case. Kent's Fourth Amendment rights were violated when he was detained without probable cause and interrogated without being read his Miranda rights. Additionally, he was not provided with counsel during the proceedings, and his parents were not informed of his arrest and detention. The appeal challenged these violations of Kent's constitutional rights.

The Kent Case Was Appealed Because He Was Unlawfully Detained