In the late 1990s, several studies claimed there was a direct link between growing rates of autism and the presence of low doses of mercury used to preserve infant immunizations.In 2000, the FDA replaced all preservatives in infant inoculations with a recently developed non-mercury-based preservative that was cheaper and more efficient.Some theories stated that the government was engaged in a cover-up because it knew that mercury-based immunizations given during infancy increased the chances of young children developing autism.What is this conclusion most likely an example of?
A) confirmation bias
B) stratified sampling
C) illusory correlation
D) random error

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The conclusion that there was a direct link between low doses of mercury in immunizations and autism is likely an example of illusory correlation, as subsequent studies have not found a causal relationship between the two. The theory of a government cover-up also suggests confirmation bias, as individuals may be seeking out evidence to support their preconceived beliefs. Stratified sampling and random error are not applicable in this context.

In the Late 1990s, Several Studies Claimed There Was a Direct