Gordon, a manager, makes the following statement: "Our experimentation with a teams-focused product development process is complete, and the evidence clearly supports adopting this process across our organization. We picked a test project to see if productivity would be better under shared leadership, team accountability, and collaborative work. That project, Zen Park Frantic, was a market success. What more do we need to know?"
Linda, another manager, responds by saying: "You are jumping to conclusions. If Zen Park Frantic went especially well, then that improvement was probably caused by the Hawthorne effect and almost any change from the normal procedures would have produced a benefit."
Which of the following is a point at issue between Gordon and Linda?
Was Zen Park Frantic a market success?
Would Zen Park Frantic have been as successful if it had followed the organization's normal procedures?
Are team-based product development processes successful in any organizational setting?
Is the "Hawthorne effect" an important concept in explaining the causes of increased productivity?
Does the evidence support a move to team-based product development?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q139: Which statement is correct regarding charismatic leadership?
Charismatic
Q140: In a move to become less hierarchical,
Q141: A company is convinced of the benefits
Q142: The sales staff at Macmoo Real Estate
Q143: The Executive Committee at Oak Meteors made
Q145: The Executive Committee at Oak Meteors made
Q146: Bill Tarnofsky makes the following statement: "We
Q147: The Executive Committee at Oak Meteors made
Q148: Marilyn Peck, the manager of human resources
Q149: The Executive Committee at Oak Meteors made
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents