Mrs North,who had limited business experience,mortgaged her property to a finance company to raise money for her husband's business.The contract greatly favoured the finance company.Two people have advised Mrs North against taking out the loan - her son,who was an accountant,and a barrister,who is a friend of the family.Mr North's business failed and the finance company has moved to sell up the property.Mrs North has been advised the finance company cannot sell up her house if she can prove that the mortgage contract was unconscionable.What is her legal position?
A) The contract is probably unconscionable because the terms favoured the finance company and Mrs North lacked business experience.
B) Although the contract is unfair it is probably not unconscionable.
C) If the court finds the contract was unfair it must find that the contract was unconscionable.
D) The contract is probably unconscionable because her only professional advice came from a friend and a relative.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: When Rihanna went overseas she asked Kylie
Q27: 'Indefeasibility of title' means that a person
Q28: A mortgagee who is exercising the power
Q29: The old system title to land relies
Q30: Which of the following statements is true
Q32: What is the name of the land
Q33: A mortgage over land protects the interests
Q34: What is the name of the document
Q35: The Torrens title system is based on:
A)the
Q36: The indefeasibility principle in the Torrens title
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents