In David Securities v.Commonwealth Bank (1992)the High Court held that restitution could be available if one of the parties:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Restitution can be available if one party gained unjust enrichment at the expense of the mistaken party. This means that if one party has received a benefit or advantage that they did not deserve or were not entitled to, and this came at the expense of the other party, then restitution may be available to restore the mistaken party to their original position. The other options (A, C, and D) are not relevant to the issue of restitution in this case.

In David Securities V