The main precedent established in Schroeder v Macaulay [1974] was:
A) if a party uses its superior bargaining position to include unreasonable and unfair restraints in a contract of employment,the restraint clauses will be void.
B) post- employment restraint clauses on senior managers are too wide and specific to be valid.
C) a worldwide restraint on an armaments dealer who had sold his business was not an unreasonable restraint of trade.
D) if one party breaks its promise to another and the innocent party will suffer loss,the guilty party is liable even though there was no restraint of trade clause or consideration in the contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: A contract for the sale of business
Q9: The purpose of a valid restraint of
Q10: Which of the following statutes or common
Q11: In Nordenfelt v Maxim- Nordenfelt Guns and
Q12: Contracts are void under common law if
Q13: A court is likely to find that
Q14: Which of the following statutes gives the
Q15: In the case of Parkinson v College
Q16: When Jill began working as an electrician
Q18: Ben and Lenny agreed that Lenny would
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents