In Nordenfelt V Maxim- Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co the Court

In Nordenfelt v Maxim- Nordenfelt Guns and Ammunition Co the court held that:

A) both restraints were unreasonable because they were too restrictive.
B) both restraints were reasonable and therefore the contract was valid.
C) one restraint was reasonable to protect the company but the other restraint was unreasonable because it was too restrictive.
D) the restraints had been properly disclosed and therefore the contract was valid.