Posner, Snyder, and Davidson (1980) examined spatial attention using arrows as a prime. Most of the time the arrow pointed to the area where the stimulus would appear, but 20% of the time it did not. They compared reaction times (RTs) when the cue was valid, when it was invalid, and when a neutral cue was presented. Which of the following statements was NOT supported by their findings?
A) RTs were slower in the invalid condition than in the valid condition.
B) Spatial attention is limited in capacity.
C) We can attend to two different locations without a reduction in performance.
D) RTs were faster for responses to valid cues relative to neutral cues.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: A patient has suffered brain damage and,as
Q31: In each trial of an experiment, participants
Q32: Where does the "attentional spotlight" reside in
Q34: The frontal lobe does NOT contain neural
Q35: All of the following statements are true
Q37: Priming based on specific expectations about the
Q37: Marcus is searching for a red square
Q38: Some researchers have compared visual attention to
Q40: Movements of attention are
A) always associated with
Q41: There are several reasons why practice can
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents