The Meiorin case
A)established that "overqualified" was not a BFOR
B)established reasonable accommodation for religious observance in the RCMP
C)clarified the type of evidence required to apply for a BFOR
D)said that firefighters don't have to be strong

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Meiorin case clarified that in order to establish a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR), an employer must show that the requirement is necessary for the job and that accommodating the individual would cause undue hardship. The court also set out the type of evidence required to establish a BFOR, including scientific evidence and evidence of industry standards. The case did not address issues related to being overqualified or religious accommodation in the RCMP, and it did not say that firefighters don't have to be strong.

The Meiorin Case