It is false that no snow storms are exhilarating events. Therefore, all snow storms are exhilarating events.
A) Invalid, illicit contraposition.
B) Invalid, existential fallacy.
C) Invalid, illicit contrary.
D) Invalid, illicit subcontrary.
E) Invalid, illicit subalternation.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument is invalid due to illicit contrary. The original statement "It is false that no snow storms are exhilarating events" implies that at least some snow storms are exhilarating, but it does not logically lead to the conclusion that all snow storms are exhilarating.

It Is False That No Snow Storms Are Exhilarating Events