No expensive menu items are unappetizing meals. Therefore, no appetizing meals are inexpensive menu items.
A) Invalid, illicit contraposition.
B) Valid, no fallacy.
C) Invalid, illicit conversion.
D) Invalid, illicit obversion.
E) Invalid, illicit subalternation.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument commits the fallacy of illicit contraposition. It incorrectly assumes that if no expensive menu items are unappetizing meals, then no appetizing meals can be inexpensive, which is a flawed contraposition.

No Expensive Menu Items Are Unappetizing Meals