Syllogism 2C
Given the following syllogism:
No dogs that do not love children are reliable watchdogs, since all dogs that don't bite are unreliable watchdogs, and no dogs that love children are dogs that bite.
-After reducing the number of terms in Syllogism 2C, the conclusion is:
A) All reliable watchdogs are dogs that love children.
B) No dogs that love children are dogs that bite.
C) All reliable watchdogs are dogs that bite.
D) All dogs that bite are reliable watchdogs.
E) All dogs that love children are reliable watchdogs.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q265: Syllogism 1C
Given the following syllogism:
No altered photos
Q266: Syllogism 2C
Given the following syllogism:
No dogs that
Q267: Sorites 1C
Given the following sorites:
All G are
Q268: Syllogism 4C
Given the following syllogism:
A boy is
Q269: Given the following enthymeme: Democratic countries have
Q271: Sorites 1C
Given the following sorites:
All G are
Q272: Given the following enthymeme: Any contract induced
Q273: Given the following enthymeme: Poorly managed airlines
Q274: Syllogism 2C
Given the following syllogism:
No dogs that
Q275: Syllogism 3C
Given the following syllogism:
There are applicants
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents