Paul said that his new dog eats virtually anything and is very fond of children. Therefore, you shouldn't let your little boy get anywhere near that dog.
A) Appeal to unqualified authority.
B) Amphiboly.
C) Equivocation.
D) No fallacy.
E) Suppressed evidence.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement is an example of amphiboly because it is ambiguous and could be interpreted in different ways. The first part suggests that the dog is not selective in what it eats, while the second part suggests that the dog is friendly towards children. However, the conclusion drawn by Paul that the little boy should not get near the dog is not directly supported by either of these statements.

Paul Said That His New Dog Eats Virtually Anything and Is