Sarah argues that all of us should support the school bond issue on the September ballot. But it's obvious why she argues this way. She has six kids currently attending public school. Clearly her argument is worthless.
A) Argument against the person, circumstantial.
B) No fallacy.
C) Appeal to unqualified authority.
D) Argument against the person, abusive.
E) You, too (tu quoque).

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This is an example of an argument against the person, circumstantial fallacy as Sarah's personal circumstances are being used to discredit her argument.

Sarah Argues That All of Us Should Support the School