The irradiation of food to destroy bacteria is an increasingly common practice. In order to determine which one of two methods of irradiation is best, a scientist took a random sample of 100 one-kilogram packages of minced meat and subjected 50 of them to irradiation method 1 and the remaining 50 to irradiation method 2. The bacteria counts were measured and the following statistics were computed. The scientist noted that the data were normally distributed. $$\begin{array} { | c | c | }
\hline \text { Method 1 } & \text { Method 2 } \
\hline \bar { x } _ { 1 } = 86 & \bar { x } _ { 2 } = 98 \
\hline s _ { 1 } ^ { 2 } = 324 & s _ { 2 } ^ { 2 } = 841 \
\hline
\end{array}$$ Determine whether these data are sufficient to infer at the 5% significance level that the two population variances differ.

Question

The irradiation of food to destroy bacteria is an increasingly common practice. In order to determine which one of two methods of irradiation is best, a scientist took a random sample of 100 one-kilogram packages of minced meat and subjected 50 of them to irradiation method 1 and the remaining 50 to irradiation method 2. The bacteria counts were measured and the following statistics were computed. The scientist noted that the data were normally distributed. $$\begin{array} { | c | c | } 
\hline \text { Method 1 } & \text { Method 2 } \
\hline \bar { x } _ { 1 } = 86 & \bar { x } _ { 2 } = 98 \
\hline s _ { 1 } ^ { 2 } = 324 & s _ { 2 } ^ { 2 } = 841 \
\hline
\end{array}$$ Determine whether these data are sufficient to infer at the 5% significance level that the two population variances differ.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of The irradiation of food to destroy bacteria is an increasingly common practice. In order to determine which one of two methods of irradiation is best, a scientist took a random sample of 100 one-kilogram packages of minced meat and subjected 50 of them to irradiation method 1 and the remaining 50 to irradiation method 2. The bacteria counts were measured and the following statistics were computed. The scientist noted that the data were normally distributed. $$\begin{array} { | c | c | } 
\hline \text { Method 1 } & \text { Method 2 } \
\hline \bar { x } _ { 1 } = 86 & \bar { x } _ { 2 } = 98 \
\hline s _ { 1 } ^ { 2 } = 324 & s _ { 2 } ^ { 2 } = 841 \
\hline
\end{array}$$ Determine whether these data are sufficient to infer at the 5% significance level that the two population variances differ.

The Irradiation of Food to Destroy Bacteria Is an Increasingly