If we assume the modern view of existential import, why is the following syllogism invalid? All finger paints are paints.
No finger paint is a condiment.
All condiments are paints.
A) undistributed middle
B) illicit major or minor term
C) two negative premises
D) negative premise with affirmative conclusion, or negative conclusion with no negative premise
E) universal premises with particular conclusion
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q115: If we assume the traditional view of
Q116: If we assume the traditional view of
Q117: If we assume the modern view of
Q118: If we assume the modern view of
Q119: If we assume the traditional view of
Q121: The fifth rule of validity, used only
Q122: Which of the following is the correct
Q123: The third rule of validity is that:
A)a
Q124: Which of the following is the correct
Q125: If the major premise of a valid
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents