Is this syllogism valid?

A) No, because there is shading in the premises that does not appear in the conclusion.
B) No, because the premises make a narrower claim than the conclusion.
C) No, because the conclusion is that something exists in the overlap of the S and P circles, but the premises only say that something might exist there.
D) Yes.
E) There is not enough information to determine the answer.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q183: Suppose that in the Venn diagram of
Q184: Could the same diagram correspond to two
Q185: What is the form of the following
Q186: Is this syllogism valid? Q187: What proposition is the missing premise of Q189: Is this syllogism valid? Q190: When making the Venn diagram of a Q191: Is this syllogism valid? Q192: What is the form of the following Q193: Is this syllogism valid? Unlock this Answer For Free Now! View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()