Is the following syllogism valid?
The child is not a girl or the child is not a boy.
The child is a girl.
The child is not a boy.
A) Yes.
B) No, because the conclusion is a negative proposition.
C) No, because the disjunctive premise ought to be the second premise, not the first.
D) No, because we don't know whether or not the second premise is true.
E) No, because the second premise affirms a disjunct rather than negating one.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: Suppose that the first premise of a
Q32: Is the following syllogism valid? Tom is
Q33: What conclusion follows from these premises? The
Q34: What conclusion follows from these premises? The
Q35: Suppose that one premise of a disjunctive
Q37: Suppose that the first premise of a
Q38: The components of a disjunctive proposition are
Q39: Suppose that one premise of a disjunctive
Q40: Is the following argument valid? At the
Q41: Which disjunctive proposition is logically equivalent to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents