If an analogy between A and B suggests that B has a property, but an analogy between B and C suggests that B doesn't have that property, then:
A) there is no way to know whether or not B has that property
B) the burden of proof is on the analogy between B and C, since the analogy between A and B was made first
C) the burden of proof is on the analogy between A and B, since the analogy between B and C challenged it
D) we decide between the two analogies by analyzing the strengths of their inductive components
E) we decide between the two analogies by analyzing the strengths of their deductive components
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: Suppose that we are evaluating the strength
Q38: What is the inductive generalization in the
Q39: In an argument by analogy, is it
Q40: Is one argument by analogy ever stronger
Q41: The first rule for evaluating inductive generalizations
Q42: The second rule for evaluating inductive generalizations
Q43: When someone makes an argument by analogy
Q45: Can all three rules for evaluating inductive
Q46: The third rule for evaluating inductive generalizations
Q47: Suppose that applying the rules for inductive
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents