Sending countries that do not receive much in the way of remittances probably gain well-being, but those receive substantial remittances probably lose well-being.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Sending countries that receive substantial remittances often rely heavily on these inflows of funds and may suffer if they decrease. Therefore, they would not lose well-being if remittances continue to flow. On the other hand, sending countries that do not receive much in the way of remittances may benefit if migration leads to reduced overpopulation or brain drain.

Sending Countries That Do Not Receive Much in the Way