Referring back to question 10, how did the outcomes of precision, range, and rank-ordered matching differ?
The three matching procedures differed in how well they controlled group weight: precision matching (mean difference = 0), range matching (mean difference = 1 pound), and rank-ordered matching (mean difference = 3.5 pounds).They also differed in the number of pairs formed: precision matching (3), range matching (7), and rank-ordered matching (8).
What are the pros and cons of using each procedure?
Precision matching provides the best control over an extraneous subject variable since group scores are identical (pro), but discards the most data (con).
Range matching allows an experimenter to balance control over an extraneous subject variable against the number of scores discarded (pro), but usually discards more scores than rank-ordered matching (con).
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q5: Selecting and Recruiting Subjects When the independent
Q6: Introduction Carlie randomly assigned subjects to either
Q7: Selecting and Recruiting Subjects A sample's representativeness
Q8: A researcher would like to match subjects
Q9: Selecting and Recruiting Subjects Researchers obtain large
Q11: Introduction Ashton studied the effect of wearing
Q12: Introduction What does "between" subjects mean in
Q13: Selecting and Recruiting Subjects Since Andrew only
Q14: People who have known each other for
Q15: Selecting and Recruiting Subjects When you want
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents