Adam moved into an apartment complex.The rules of the complex prohibit unmarried men and women from living together in the same apartment.When Adam's friend,Diane,moved into the apartment he was served with eviction papers.Adam claims the apartment complex is violating his constitutional rights since it allows married couples to live together.Is Adam right?
A) Yes. His equal protection rights have been violated.
B) No. Although he has a fundamental right of cohabitation, it has not been violated.
C) Yes. He and Diane are being treated differently than married couples.
D) No. Even if an equal protection violation could be proven, constitutional protections do not extend to privately owned apartment complexes.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: The United States v.Lopez case demonstrates which
Q21: Lori and her friends burn an American
Q22: Judicial review can best be described as
Q25: Ikerd was entering the United States from
Q28: The "dormant" aspect of the Commerce Clause
A)is
Q30: Fundamental rights include all EXCEPT the right
Q31: If Oregon passed a statute that prohibited
Q32: A woman wishes to attend an all-male,publicly
Q39: The process of extending virtually all of
Q40: The states have a severely restricted power
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents