(A) Why can the caption of Case IV read Briar Patch Dolls, Inc. v. Teeny Tiny
Manufacturing Co. rather than Heinz v. Smith and McGinnis? (B) If Teeny Tiny were owned solely by Ethel Meyers, now deceased, could Briar Patch still sue? Why or why not?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of (A) Why can the caption of Case IV read Briar Patch Dolls, Inc. v. Teeny Tiny
Manufacturing Co. rather than Heinz v. Smith and McGinnis? (B) If Teeny Tiny were owned solely by Ethel Meyers, now deceased, could Briar Patch still sue? Why or why not?

(A) Why Can the Caption of Case IV Read Briar