Sarah,an employee of Amex Corporation,committed a serious criminal act in an attempt to obtain a large sales order for her employer.A court found her guilty of the felony and also found the corporation guilty of criminal conduct.The company was fined $1 million.The court
A) erred in fining the company since finding both Sarah and the corporation guilty violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution.
B) acted properly if this were a federal proceeding; however, it did not act properly if this were a state proceeding.
C) acted properly in finding Sarah guilty; however it erred in finding the corporation guilty because of the exclusionary rule.
D) acted properly in this case.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: The fraudulent conversion of property which is
Q32: When does a criminal defendant have the
Q34: Which of the following makes it illegal
Q35: Illegally obtained evidence is not permitted to
Q36: The criminal penalties under RICO include all
Q41: Mary was suspicious of her neighbor,whom she
Q41: What is the exclusionary rule and what
Q42: Compare and contrast money laundering and embezzlement.Give
Q44: List and discuss the protections afforded criminal
Q45: Explain the difference between civil law and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents