In December 2016, Technology University received a $2 million grant from the National Hockey Association to develop an effective neck brace to prevent injuries in its non-goalie hockey players. The NHA grant was intended to cover $1.5 million of direct costs and $0.5 million of overhead costs. The grant stipulated that the NHA would be the sole beneficiary of the research. Technology carried out the research in 2017. As anticipated, direct costs were $1.5 million.
REQUIRED:
a. What accounting entries, if any, should Technology make when notified of the grant?
b. What accounting entries, if any, should Technology make in 2017? (Be sure to indicate in which funds the entries would be recorded.)
c. Would your answer be different if the research were made available to the general public and not just the NHA? Explain.
d. Would your answer be different if the NHA indicated it would not make any payments on the research until Technology delivered the final research product?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q56: When should a not-for-profit entity recognize pledge
Q57: A donor pledges $100,000 to the Shakespeare
Q58: During the year, a not-for-profit entity received
Q59: Save the Children Foundation had the following
Q60: Which of the following entities should recognize
Q61: Per FASB standards, not-for-profits must classify their
Q62: A generous benefactor pledges $1 million to
Q63: What is a charitable remainder trust? How
Q64: For each of the cases below, state
Q65: In June 2016, the wealthy parents of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents