You have been asked to evaluate the effectiveness of a new anti-smoking campaign in a local high school. You are able to collect pretest information on smoking rates before the campaign begins. You know that the entire school will be required to participate in the campaign and so random assignment is impossible.You are also aware that a reduction in smoking after the campaign could be caused by any number of other confounding variables.What can you do in this situation to enhance your ability to determine if the campaign was effective in reducing smoking?
A) test the students at the end of the campaign and then again a year later - if reductions in smoking remain at that time then you can be confident that the campaign was effective
B) conduct extensive postexperimental interviews to determine the cause of any change in smoking rates
C) identify a similar school that is not using the campaign and include them in a nonequivalent comparison group design
D) interview parents of the students
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Dr. Johannsen wants to test whether recovering
Q3: The nonequivalent comparison group design can yield
Q4: When one does not have the ability
Q5: When using a quasi-experimental design, rival hypotheses
Q6: The nonequivalent comparison-group design does NOT have
Q8: The non-equivalent comparison group design is a
Q9: Which of the following designs is the
Q10: What is the main distinction between the
Q11: The internal validity threat known as "history"
Q12: One strategy for dealing with preexisting differences
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents