Mill's theory, like Kant's (Reading 2.1), is a comprehensive ethical theory. Therefore, a parallel question about how to respond to its comprehensiveness arises. The issues, again, are as follows: Many people believe that Mill's theory is usually but not always right, asserting that they need flexibility in their decision making. Others reply that if we are going to make exceptions, the point of having a theory is lost, asserting that the reason to have a theory such as utilitarianism is that it is the only way to avoid rationalizing. Who is right and why?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q10: Kant indicates that the exercise of reason
Q11: According to Mill, "utility" and "pleasure" are
Q12: Not all types of pleasure are of
Q13: According to Kant, the only thing good
Q14: How does Mill argue that human beings
Q16: When comparing two kinds of pleasure, how
Q17: Kant discusses two possible answers that one
Q18: What makes an action right, according to
Q19: According to Kant, we should only treat
Q20: Does Mill's theory imply that sometimes it
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents