Prinz argues that if one cannot provide reasons for his or her position in moral philosophy, that position must be cast out, as if it were manifestly false.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Prinz argues for a form of moral relativism, suggesting that moral truths can vary based on cultural or individual perspectives. He does not claim that a position must be cast out if one cannot provide reasons for it; instead, he emphasizes understanding the emotional and cultural underpinnings of moral judgments.

Prinz Argues That If One Cannot Provide Reasons for His