Locke argued that a person could acquire property if he put his labor into it, used it to meet his needs, and did not cause harm to another in so using it. One could not, he argued, gain ownership of property one did not need. If we allow that one can use property for the needs of others as well, do you think that Locke's principle is ethical? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q6: Restate Locke's criteria for the just possession
Q7: Adam Smith argues that if persons pursue
Q8: When appropriating property, Locke says one can
Q9: Marx says that the key to ending
Q10: Do you think that putting ones labor
Q12: Locke argues that we may appropriate nature
Q13: According to Locke, a person can acquire
Q14: Locke thought that if the principle above
Q15: What is the consequence of each man
Q16: Smith famously argued that if persons pursue
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents