Leopold's primary argument is that there has been a moral evolution insofar as human beings have gradually expanded their moral consideration to people different from themselves. Do you see a reason why the expansion should not extend beyond human beings? Is so, what is it? How do you think Leopold might respond to your objection?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q5: Naess takes issue with the term "shallow
Q6: Naess advocates shallow ecology.
Q7: What does Taylor say about the supposed
Q8: Taylor argues that plants and animals have
Q9: What does Naess refer to as "shallow"
Q11: What does Leopold identify as the core
Q12: Leopold writes that the "extension of ethics,
Q13: Naess distinguishes between what he calls "shallow"
Q14: Taylor contrasts "human-centered" and "life-centered" systems of
Q15: Restate in your own words the two
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents