The decision in the Caparo case (1990) reduced the duty of care of auditors to:
A) all users known to the auditor.
B) all users that ought reasonably to have been known to the auditor.
C) the shareholders as a group.
D) all users of the financial statements, except for investors.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: What is the term used when a
Q2: Which of these is not a condition
Q3: The so-called 'deep-pockets' theory in relation to
Q4: The correct statement is: Litigation against auditors
Q6: Which case laid down the fundamental auditing
Q7: Which case prompted the development of more
Q8: The judgement in the Pacific Acceptance case
Q9: Under the Hedley Byrne principle, auditors' liability
Q10: Auditors are accountable in law for their
Q11: The statement that is not reflective of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents